Arkadiusz Drozdzynski vs Jedrzej Adamczewski
2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Arkadiusz Drozdzynski vs Jedrzej Adamczewski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Arkadiusz Drozdzynski (1898)
- Black
- Jedrzej Adamczewski (1922)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24)
About this chess game
This chess game between Arkadiusz Drozdzynski (1898) and Jedrzej Adamczewski (1922) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Arkadiusz Drozdzynski games or Jedrzej Adamczewski games? This Arkadiusz Drozdzynski vs Jedrzej Adamczewski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Arkadiusz Drozdzynski vs Jedrzej Adamczewski?
Arkadiusz Drozdzynski vs Jedrzej Adamczewski (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Arkadiusz Drozdzynski vs Jedrzej Adamczewski?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B24).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Arkadiusz Drozdzynski vs Jedrzej Adamczewski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.