Petar Drenchev vs Vasil Iliev
Radomir BUL, Open 2009, 2009 · Result 1–0 · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Petar Drenchev vs Vasil Iliev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Petar Drenchev (2480)
- Black
- Vasil Iliev (2137)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Radomir BUL, Open 2009
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Petar Drenchev (2480) and Vasil Iliev (2137) was played at Radomir BUL, Open 2009 in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Petar Drenchev games or Vasil Iliev games? This Petar Drenchev vs Vasil Iliev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Petar Drenchev vs Vasil Iliev?
Petar Drenchev vs Vasil Iliev (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Petar Drenchev.
What opening was played in Petar Drenchev vs Vasil Iliev?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Petar Drenchev vs Vasil Iliev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.