Constantin Dragomir vs Cristian-Gabriel Voiteanu
Baile Olanesti ROM, Men Ch 2010, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Petrov's Defense (C42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Constantin Dragomir vs Cristian-Gabriel Voiteanu with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Constantin Dragomir (2069)
- Black
- Cristian-Gabriel Voiteanu (2261)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Baile Olanesti ROM, Men Ch 2010
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Petrov's Defense (C42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Constantin Dragomir (2069) and Cristian-Gabriel Voiteanu (2261) was played at Baile Olanesti ROM, Men Ch 2010 in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Petrov's Defense (C42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Constantin Dragomir games or Cristian-Gabriel Voiteanu games? This Constantin Dragomir vs Cristian-Gabriel Voiteanu encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Petrov's Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Constantin Dragomir vs Cristian-Gabriel Voiteanu?
Constantin Dragomir vs Cristian-Gabriel Voiteanu (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Constantin Dragomir vs Cristian-Gabriel Voiteanu?
The game opened with the Petrov's Defense (ECO C42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Constantin Dragomir vs Cristian-Gabriel Voiteanu, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.