Domagoj Dragicevic vs Igor Goldenberg
2012 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (B61).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Domagoj Dragicevic vs Igor Goldenberg with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Domagoj Dragicevic (2302)
- Black
- Igor Goldenberg (2376)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (B61)
About this chess game
This chess game between Domagoj Dragicevic (2302) and Igor Goldenberg (2376) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (B61). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Domagoj Dragicevic games or Igor Goldenberg games? This Domagoj Dragicevic vs Igor Goldenberg encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Domagoj Dragicevic vs Igor Goldenberg?
Domagoj Dragicevic vs Igor Goldenberg (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Domagoj Dragicevic vs Igor Goldenberg?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B61).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Domagoj Dragicevic vs Igor Goldenberg, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.