Rafaela Rezende Dos Santos vs Jessica de Morais Lira
2013 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rafaela Rezende Dos Santos vs Jessica de Morais Lira with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rafaela Rezende Dos Santos (1774)
- Black
- Jessica de Morais Lira (1801)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rafaela Rezende Dos Santos (1774) and Jessica de Morais Lira (1801) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rafaela Rezende Dos Santos games or Jessica de Morais Lira games? This Rafaela Rezende Dos Santos vs Jessica de Morais Lira encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rafaela Rezende Dos Santos vs Jessica de Morais Lira?
Rafaela Rezende Dos Santos vs Jessica de Morais Lira (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Rafaela Rezende Dos Santos vs Jessica de Morais Lira?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (ECO B30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rafaela Rezende Dos Santos vs Jessica de Morais Lira, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.