Boby Dorosiev vs Alexandar Davidov
BUL/TC13 (BUL), 2011 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Boby Dorosiev vs Alexandar Davidov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Boby Dorosiev
- Black
- Alexandar Davidov (2261)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- BUL/TC13 (BUL)
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Boby Dorosiev and Alexandar Davidov (2261) was played at BUL/TC13 (BUL) in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Boby Dorosiev games or Alexandar Davidov games? This Boby Dorosiev vs Alexandar Davidov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Boby Dorosiev vs Alexandar Davidov?
Boby Dorosiev vs Alexandar Davidov (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Boby Dorosiev vs Alexandar Davidov?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (ECO E48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Boby Dorosiev vs Alexandar Davidov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.