Anatoly Donchenko vs Daniel Prenzler
2013 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Anatoly Donchenko vs Daniel Prenzler with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Anatoly Donchenko (2353)
- Black
- Daniel Prenzler (2185)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Anatoly Donchenko (2353) and Daniel Prenzler (2185) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Anatoly Donchenko games or Daniel Prenzler games? This Anatoly Donchenko vs Daniel Prenzler encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Anatoly Donchenko vs Daniel Prenzler?
Anatoly Donchenko vs Daniel Prenzler (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Anatoly Donchenko.
What opening was played in Anatoly Donchenko vs Daniel Prenzler?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (ECO A31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Anatoly Donchenko vs Daniel Prenzler, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.