Laura Lucia Dominguez vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez
2015 · Result 0–1 · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Laura Lucia Dominguez vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Laura Lucia Dominguez (2029)
- Black
- Jackeline Salcedo Paez (1983)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Laura Lucia Dominguez (2029) and Jackeline Salcedo Paez (1983) was played in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Laura Lucia Dominguez games or Jackeline Salcedo Paez games? This Laura Lucia Dominguez vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Laura Lucia Dominguez vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez?
Laura Lucia Dominguez vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Jackeline Salcedo Paez.
What opening was played in Laura Lucia Dominguez vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Laura Lucia Dominguez vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.