Hevzi Doda vs Blerim Gashi
2018 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hevzi Doda vs Blerim Gashi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hevzi Doda (1983)
- Black
- Blerim Gashi (2067)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hevzi Doda (1983) and Blerim Gashi (2067) was played in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hevzi Doda games or Blerim Gashi games? This Hevzi Doda vs Blerim Gashi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hevzi Doda vs Blerim Gashi?
Hevzi Doda vs Blerim Gashi (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Blerim Gashi.
What opening was played in Hevzi Doda vs Blerim Gashi?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hevzi Doda vs Blerim Gashi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.