Lucas Do Valle Cardoso vs Dirk D. Van Riemsdijk
2019 · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lucas Do Valle Cardoso vs Dirk D. Van Riemsdijk with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lucas Do Valle Cardoso (2198)
- Black
- Dirk D. Van Riemsdijk (1931)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lucas Do Valle Cardoso (2198) and Dirk D. Van Riemsdijk (1931) was played in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lucas Do Valle Cardoso games or Dirk D. Van Riemsdijk games? This Lucas Do Valle Cardoso vs Dirk D. Van Riemsdijk encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lucas Do Valle Cardoso vs Dirk D. Van Riemsdijk?
Lucas Do Valle Cardoso vs Dirk D. Van Riemsdijk (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Lucas Do Valle Cardoso.
What opening was played in Lucas Do Valle Cardoso vs Dirk D. Van Riemsdijk?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lucas Do Valle Cardoso vs Dirk D. Van Riemsdijk, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.