Gabriel Carckeno Do Carmo vs Leandro Custodio
87. ch-BRA 2021, 2021 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28).
Analyze this game
Open Gabriel Carckeno Do Carmo vs Leandro Custodio on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gabriel Carckeno Do Carmo (1398)
- Black
- Leandro Custodio (1953)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 87. ch-BRA 2021
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gabriel Carckeno Do Carmo (1398) and Leandro Custodio (1953) was played at 87. ch-BRA 2021 in 2021 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gabriel Carckeno Do Carmo games or Leandro Custodio games? This Gabriel Carckeno Do Carmo vs Leandro Custodio encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gabriel Carckeno Do Carmo vs Leandro Custodio?
Gabriel Carckeno Do Carmo vs Leandro Custodio (2021) finished 1–0, a win for Gabriel Carckeno Do Carmo.
What opening was played in Gabriel Carckeno Do Carmo vs Leandro Custodio?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gabriel Carckeno Do Carmo vs Leandro Custodio, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.