Maxim Dlugy vs Jonathan Dourerassou
2. GP Pyramides-Trophee Kaissa, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation (D90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maxim Dlugy vs Jonathan Dourerassou with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maxim Dlugy (2524)
- Black
- Jonathan Dourerassou (2484)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 2. GP Pyramides-Trophee Kaissa
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation (D90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maxim Dlugy (2524) and Jonathan Dourerassou (2484) was played at 2. GP Pyramides-Trophee Kaissa in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation (D90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maxim Dlugy games or Jonathan Dourerassou games? This Maxim Dlugy vs Jonathan Dourerassou encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maxim Dlugy vs Jonathan Dourerassou?
Maxim Dlugy vs Jonathan Dourerassou (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Jonathan Dourerassou.
What opening was played in Maxim Dlugy vs Jonathan Dourerassou?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO D90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maxim Dlugy vs Jonathan Dourerassou, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.