Marko Djukanovic vs David Bibas
IBCA Wch blind 5th, 1982 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marko Djukanovic vs David Bibas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marko Djukanovic (2225)
- Black
- David Bibas (2025)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- IBCA Wch blind 5th
- Year
- 1982
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marko Djukanovic (2225) and David Bibas (2025) was played at IBCA Wch blind 5th in 1982 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marko Djukanovic games or David Bibas games? This Marko Djukanovic vs David Bibas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marko Djukanovic vs David Bibas?
Marko Djukanovic vs David Bibas (1982) finished 1–0, a win for Marko Djukanovic.
What opening was played in Marko Djukanovic vs David Bibas?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (ECO A39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marko Djukanovic vs David Bibas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.