R. N.. Dixon vs Stan E. Cranmer
BCCA/GoldP/2015 (ENG), 2015 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay R. N.. Dixon vs Stan E. Cranmer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- R. N.. Dixon (1894)
- Black
- Stan E. Cranmer (2115)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- BCCA/GoldP/2015 (ENG)
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between R. N.. Dixon (1894) and Stan E. Cranmer (2115) was played at BCCA/GoldP/2015 (ENG) in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more R. N.. Dixon games or Stan E. Cranmer games? This R. N.. Dixon vs Stan E. Cranmer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won R. N.. Dixon vs Stan E. Cranmer?
R. N.. Dixon vs Stan E. Cranmer (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in R. N.. Dixon vs Stan E. Cranmer?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of R. N.. Dixon vs Stan E. Cranmer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.