Peter Dittmar vs Stelios Halkias
ChessOrg A, 2022 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Dittmar vs Stelios Halkias with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Dittmar (2230)
- Black
- Stelios Halkias (2527)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- ChessOrg A
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Dittmar (2230) and Stelios Halkias (2527) was played at ChessOrg A in 2022 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Dittmar games or Stelios Halkias games? This Peter Dittmar vs Stelios Halkias encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Dittmar vs Stelios Halkias?
Peter Dittmar vs Stelios Halkias (2022) finished 0–1, a win for Stelios Halkias.
What opening was played in Peter Dittmar vs Stelios Halkias?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (ECO A21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Dittmar vs Stelios Halkias, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.