Paulo Nobile Diniz vs Guilherme Martins G Oliveira
2013 · Result ½–½ · Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation (B04).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paulo Nobile Diniz vs Guilherme Martins G Oliveira with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paulo Nobile Diniz (1804)
- Black
- Guilherme Martins G Oliveira (1789)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation (B04)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paulo Nobile Diniz (1804) and Guilherme Martins G Oliveira (1789) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation (B04). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paulo Nobile Diniz games or Guilherme Martins G Oliveira games? This Paulo Nobile Diniz vs Guilherme Martins G Oliveira encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paulo Nobile Diniz vs Guilherme Martins G Oliveira?
Paulo Nobile Diniz vs Guilherme Martins G Oliveira (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Paulo Nobile Diniz vs Guilherme Martins G Oliveira?
The game opened with the Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation (ECO B04).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paulo Nobile Diniz vs Guilherme Martins G Oliveira, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.