Viacheslav Dinerchtein vs Peter Paul Geluk
WS/H/595, 2017 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Viacheslav Dinerchtein vs Peter Paul Geluk with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Viacheslav Dinerchtein (1906)
- Black
- Peter Paul Geluk (1641)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- WS/H/595
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Viacheslav Dinerchtein (1906) and Peter Paul Geluk (1641) was played at WS/H/595 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Viacheslav Dinerchtein games or Peter Paul Geluk games? This Viacheslav Dinerchtein vs Peter Paul Geluk encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Viacheslav Dinerchtein vs Peter Paul Geluk?
Viacheslav Dinerchtein vs Peter Paul Geluk (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Peter Paul Geluk.
What opening was played in Viacheslav Dinerchtein vs Peter Paul Geluk?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Viacheslav Dinerchtein vs Peter Paul Geluk, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.