Johannes Dietrich vs Hans-Erich Koetting
2011 · Result ½–½ · Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Ultra-Delayed Exchange Variation (D79).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Johannes Dietrich vs Hans-Erich Koetting with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Johannes Dietrich (1788)
- Black
- Hans-Erich Koetting (2113)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Ultra-Delayed Exchange Variation (D79)
About this chess game
This chess game between Johannes Dietrich (1788) and Hans-Erich Koetting (2113) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Ultra-Delayed Exchange Variation (D79). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Johannes Dietrich games or Hans-Erich Koetting games? This Johannes Dietrich vs Hans-Erich Koetting encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Ultra-Delayed Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Johannes Dietrich vs Hans-Erich Koetting?
Johannes Dietrich vs Hans-Erich Koetting (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Johannes Dietrich vs Hans-Erich Koetting?
The game opened with the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Ultra-Delayed Exchange Variation (ECO D79).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Johannes Dietrich vs Hans-Erich Koetting, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.