Duncan Dicks vs Graham A Waddingham
Midland Ch Forrest Cup, 1984 · Result 0–1 · King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Duncan Dicks vs Graham A Waddingham with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Duncan Dicks (1724)
- Black
- Graham A Waddingham (2215)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Midland Ch Forrest Cup
- Year
- 1984
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Duncan Dicks (1724) and Graham A Waddingham (2215) was played at Midland Ch Forrest Cup in 1984 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Duncan Dicks games or Graham A Waddingham games? This Duncan Dicks vs Graham A Waddingham encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Duncan Dicks vs Graham A Waddingham?
Duncan Dicks vs Graham A Waddingham (1984) finished 0–1, a win for Graham A Waddingham.
What opening was played in Duncan Dicks vs Graham A Waddingham?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (ECO C37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Duncan Dicks vs Graham A Waddingham, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.