Jaime Walter Diaz vs Pedro Andres Avila
Bogota COL, 5. Open, 2011 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaime Walter Diaz vs Pedro Andres Avila with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaime Walter Diaz (2242)
- Black
- Pedro Andres Avila (2102)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Bogota COL, 5. Open
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaime Walter Diaz (2242) and Pedro Andres Avila (2102) was played at Bogota COL, 5. Open in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaime Walter Diaz games or Pedro Andres Avila games? This Jaime Walter Diaz vs Pedro Andres Avila encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaime Walter Diaz vs Pedro Andres Avila?
Jaime Walter Diaz vs Pedro Andres Avila (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Pedro Andres Avila.
What opening was played in Jaime Walter Diaz vs Pedro Andres Avila?
The game opened with the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (ECO A18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaime Walter Diaz vs Pedro Andres Avila, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.