Julio Diaz Gimenez vs Carlos Vinas Lopez
2019 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Julio Diaz Gimenez vs Carlos Vinas Lopez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Julio Diaz Gimenez (1627)
- Black
- Carlos Vinas Lopez (1887)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Julio Diaz Gimenez (1627) and Carlos Vinas Lopez (1887) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Julio Diaz Gimenez games or Carlos Vinas Lopez games? This Julio Diaz Gimenez vs Carlos Vinas Lopez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Julio Diaz Gimenez vs Carlos Vinas Lopez?
Julio Diaz Gimenez vs Carlos Vinas Lopez (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Julio Diaz Gimenez vs Carlos Vinas Lopez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (ECO B45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Julio Diaz Gimenez vs Carlos Vinas Lopez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.