Damianos Diasakos vs Sevastianos Papadogiannis
2009 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (E71).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Damianos Diasakos vs Sevastianos Papadogiannis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Damianos Diasakos (1684)
- Black
- Sevastianos Papadogiannis (1957)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (E71)
About this chess game
This chess game between Damianos Diasakos (1684) and Sevastianos Papadogiannis (1957) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (E71). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Damianos Diasakos games or Sevastianos Papadogiannis games? This Damianos Diasakos vs Sevastianos Papadogiannis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Damianos Diasakos vs Sevastianos Papadogiannis?
Damianos Diasakos vs Sevastianos Papadogiannis (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Damianos Diasakos vs Sevastianos Papadogiannis?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (ECO E71).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Damianos Diasakos vs Sevastianos Papadogiannis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.