Patricio di Franco vs Wolfram Schneider
2011 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Sokolsky Variation (D89).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Patricio di Franco vs Wolfram Schneider with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Patricio di Franco (2124)
- Black
- Wolfram Schneider (2017)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Sokolsky Variation (D89)
About this chess game
This chess game between Patricio di Franco (2124) and Wolfram Schneider (2017) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Sokolsky Variation (D89). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Patricio di Franco games or Wolfram Schneider games? This Patricio di Franco vs Wolfram Schneider encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Sokolsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Patricio di Franco vs Wolfram Schneider?
Patricio di Franco vs Wolfram Schneider (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Patricio di Franco vs Wolfram Schneider?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Sokolsky Variation (ECO D89).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Patricio di Franco vs Wolfram Schneider, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.