Daniel Otavio Silva Dezejacomo vs Leonardo Fernandes Borges
2016 · Result ½–½ · Alekhine Defense (B02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Otavio Silva Dezejacomo vs Leonardo Fernandes Borges with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Otavio Silva Dezejacomo (1657)
- Black
- Leonardo Fernandes Borges (1855)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Alekhine Defense (B02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Otavio Silva Dezejacomo (1657) and Leonardo Fernandes Borges (1855) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Alekhine Defense (B02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Otavio Silva Dezejacomo games or Leonardo Fernandes Borges games? This Daniel Otavio Silva Dezejacomo vs Leonardo Fernandes Borges encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Alekhine Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Otavio Silva Dezejacomo vs Leonardo Fernandes Borges?
Daniel Otavio Silva Dezejacomo vs Leonardo Fernandes Borges (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Daniel Otavio Silva Dezejacomo vs Leonardo Fernandes Borges?
The game opened with the Alekhine Defense (ECO B02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Otavio Silva Dezejacomo vs Leonardo Fernandes Borges, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.