Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Caio Henrique dos Santos Silva
2008 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Caio Henrique dos Santos Silva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joaquim de Deus Filho (2067)
- Black
- Caio Henrique dos Santos Silva (1861)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joaquim de Deus Filho (2067) and Caio Henrique dos Santos Silva (1861) was played in 2008 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joaquim de Deus Filho games or Caio Henrique dos Santos Silva games? This Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Caio Henrique dos Santos Silva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Caio Henrique dos Santos Silva?
Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Caio Henrique dos Santos Silva (2008) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Caio Henrique dos Santos Silva?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Caio Henrique dos Santos Silva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.