Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Leonardo De Miranda Rodrigues
2015 · Result ½–½ · Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit (C29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Leonardo De Miranda Rodrigues with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joaquim de Deus Filho (1894)
- Black
- Leonardo De Miranda Rodrigues (2178)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit (C29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joaquim de Deus Filho (1894) and Leonardo De Miranda Rodrigues (2178) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit (C29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joaquim de Deus Filho games or Leonardo De Miranda Rodrigues games? This Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Leonardo De Miranda Rodrigues encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Leonardo De Miranda Rodrigues?
Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Leonardo De Miranda Rodrigues (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Leonardo De Miranda Rodrigues?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit (ECO C29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joaquim de Deus Filho vs Leonardo De Miranda Rodrigues, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.