Francisco Denis vs Francisco Jose Perez Perez
1958 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation, Knight Defense (D51).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Denis vs Francisco Jose Perez Perez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Denis
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 1958
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation, Knight Defense (D51)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Denis and Francisco Jose Perez Perez was played in 1958 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation, Knight Defense (D51). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Denis games or Francisco Jose Perez Perez games? This Francisco Denis vs Francisco Jose Perez Perez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation, Knight Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Denis vs Francisco Jose Perez Perez?
Francisco Denis vs Francisco Jose Perez Perez (1958) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Francisco Denis vs Francisco Jose Perez Perez?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation, Knight Defense (ECO D51).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Denis vs Francisco Jose Perez Perez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.