Paul Demel vs Bergit, Dr. Barthel
Schwaebisch Gmuend GER, 22. Open, 2010 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paul Demel vs Bergit, Dr. Barthel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paul Demel (2172)
- Black
- Bergit, Dr. Barthel (2029)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Schwaebisch Gmuend GER, 22. Open
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paul Demel (2172) and Bergit, Dr. Barthel (2029) was played at Schwaebisch Gmuend GER, 22. Open in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paul Demel games or Bergit, Dr. Barthel games? This Paul Demel vs Bergit, Dr. Barthel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paul Demel vs Bergit, Dr. Barthel?
Paul Demel vs Bergit, Dr. Barthel (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Paul Demel.
What opening was played in Paul Demel vs Bergit, Dr. Barthel?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paul Demel vs Bergit, Dr. Barthel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.