Pablo Della Morte vs Federico Lupis
2017 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pablo Della Morte vs Federico Lupis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pablo Della Morte (2342)
- Black
- Federico Lupis (1970)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pablo Della Morte (2342) and Federico Lupis (1970) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pablo Della Morte games or Federico Lupis games? This Pablo Della Morte vs Federico Lupis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pablo Della Morte vs Federico Lupis?
Pablo Della Morte vs Federico Lupis (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Pablo Della Morte.
What opening was played in Pablo Della Morte vs Federico Lupis?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (ECO E62).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pablo Della Morte vs Federico Lupis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.