Jose Miguel Delgado Delgado vs Hartmut Glaeser
2016 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (A85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Miguel Delgado Delgado vs Hartmut Glaeser with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jose Miguel Delgado Delgado (1832)
- Black
- Hartmut Glaeser (1741)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (A85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Miguel Delgado Delgado (1832) and Hartmut Glaeser (1741) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (A85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Miguel Delgado Delgado games or Hartmut Glaeser games? This Jose Miguel Delgado Delgado vs Hartmut Glaeser encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Miguel Delgado Delgado vs Hartmut Glaeser?
Jose Miguel Delgado Delgado vs Hartmut Glaeser (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Jose Miguel Delgado Delgado.
What opening was played in Jose Miguel Delgado Delgado vs Hartmut Glaeser?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO A85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Miguel Delgado Delgado vs Hartmut Glaeser, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.