Jean-Marc Degraeve vs Loek Van Wely
TCh-FRA Top 12 2017, 2017 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jean-Marc Degraeve vs Loek Van Wely with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jean-Marc Degraeve (2592)
- Black
- Loek Van Wely (2663)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- TCh-FRA Top 12 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jean-Marc Degraeve (2592) and Loek Van Wely (2663) was played at TCh-FRA Top 12 2017 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jean-Marc Degraeve games or Loek Van Wely games? This Jean-Marc Degraeve vs Loek Van Wely encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jean-Marc Degraeve vs Loek Van Wely?
Jean-Marc Degraeve vs Loek Van Wely (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Loek Van Wely.
What opening was played in Jean-Marc Degraeve vs Loek Van Wely?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (ECO B43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jean-Marc Degraeve vs Loek Van Wely, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.