Ludwig Deglmann vs Bernhard Gerstner
Bad Wiessee GER, 14. OIBM, 2010 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ludwig Deglmann vs Bernhard Gerstner with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ludwig Deglmann (2385)
- Black
- Bernhard Gerstner (2188)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Bad Wiessee GER, 14. OIBM
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ludwig Deglmann (2385) and Bernhard Gerstner (2188) was played at Bad Wiessee GER, 14. OIBM in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ludwig Deglmann games or Bernhard Gerstner games? This Ludwig Deglmann vs Bernhard Gerstner encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ludwig Deglmann vs Bernhard Gerstner?
Ludwig Deglmann vs Bernhard Gerstner (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Ludwig Deglmann.
What opening was played in Ludwig Deglmann vs Bernhard Gerstner?
The game opened with the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (ECO A11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ludwig Deglmann vs Bernhard Gerstner, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.