David J Deacon vs Edward Davies
Hampshire Open, 2007 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David J Deacon vs Edward Davies with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David J Deacon (1604)
- Black
- Edward Davies
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Hampshire Open
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16)
About this chess game
This chess game between David J Deacon (1604) and Edward Davies was played at Hampshire Open in 2007 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David J Deacon games or Edward Davies games? This David J Deacon vs Edward Davies encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David J Deacon vs Edward Davies?
David J Deacon vs Edward Davies (2007) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in David J Deacon vs Edward Davies?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (ECO A16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David J Deacon vs Edward Davies, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.