Araujo Otavio Antonio De vs Romualdo L Portela De Oliveira
Corr, 1995 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Open (B33).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Araujo Otavio Antonio De vs Romualdo L Portela De Oliveira with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Romualdo L Portela De Oliveira (1905)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Corr
- Year
- 1995
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Open (B33)
About this chess game
This chess game between Araujo Otavio Antonio De and Romualdo L Portela De Oliveira (1905) was played at Corr in 1995 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Open (B33). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Araujo Otavio Antonio De games or Romualdo L Portela De Oliveira games? This Araujo Otavio Antonio De vs Romualdo L Portela De Oliveira encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Open.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Araujo Otavio Antonio De vs Romualdo L Portela De Oliveira?
Araujo Otavio Antonio De vs Romualdo L Portela De Oliveira (1995) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Araujo Otavio Antonio De vs Romualdo L Portela De Oliveira?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Open (ECO B33).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Araujo Otavio Antonio De vs Romualdo L Portela De Oliveira, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.