Matheus Mazim De Sousa vs Leonardo Yamamoto Por Goncalves
2014 · Result 1–0 · Old Indian Defense (A53).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Matheus Mazim De Sousa vs Leonardo Yamamoto Por Goncalves with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Matheus Mazim De Sousa (2042)
- Black
- Leonardo Yamamoto Por Goncalves (1935)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Old Indian Defense (A53)
About this chess game
This chess game between Matheus Mazim De Sousa (2042) and Leonardo Yamamoto Por Goncalves (1935) was played in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Old Indian Defense (A53). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Matheus Mazim De Sousa games or Leonardo Yamamoto Por Goncalves games? This Matheus Mazim De Sousa vs Leonardo Yamamoto Por Goncalves encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Old Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Matheus Mazim De Sousa vs Leonardo Yamamoto Por Goncalves?
Matheus Mazim De Sousa vs Leonardo Yamamoto Por Goncalves (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Matheus Mazim De Sousa.
What opening was played in Matheus Mazim De Sousa vs Leonardo Yamamoto Por Goncalves?
The game opened with the Old Indian Defense (ECO A53).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Matheus Mazim De Sousa vs Leonardo Yamamoto Por Goncalves, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.