Alessio De Santis vs Francesco Bentivegna
43. TCh-ITA 2011, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alessio De Santis vs Francesco Bentivegna with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alessio De Santis (2295)
- Black
- Francesco Bentivegna (2317)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 43. TCh-ITA 2011
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alessio De Santis (2295) and Francesco Bentivegna (2317) was played at 43. TCh-ITA 2011 in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alessio De Santis games or Francesco Bentivegna games? This Alessio De Santis vs Francesco Bentivegna encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alessio De Santis vs Francesco Bentivegna?
Alessio De Santis vs Francesco Bentivegna (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Alessio De Santis.
What opening was played in Alessio De Santis vs Francesco Bentivegna?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alessio De Santis vs Francesco Bentivegna, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.