Michael De Ridder vs Ludwik Pazderski
4. LSS CUP P-00037, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michael De Ridder vs Ludwik Pazderski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michael De Ridder (1812)
- Black
- Ludwik Pazderski (2205)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 4. LSS CUP P-00037
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michael De Ridder (1812) and Ludwik Pazderski (2205) was played at 4. LSS CUP P-00037 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michael De Ridder games or Ludwik Pazderski games? This Michael De Ridder vs Ludwik Pazderski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michael De Ridder vs Ludwik Pazderski?
Michael De Ridder vs Ludwik Pazderski (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Ludwik Pazderski.
What opening was played in Michael De Ridder vs Ludwik Pazderski?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (ECO B52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michael De Ridder vs Ludwik Pazderski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.