Giovanni De Rasis vs Francesco De Marco
I Open Praiascacchi, 2007 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E77).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Giovanni De Rasis vs Francesco De Marco with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Giovanni De Rasis (1912)
- Black
- Francesco De Marco (1782)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- I Open Praiascacchi
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E77)
About this chess game
This chess game between Giovanni De Rasis (1912) and Francesco De Marco (1782) was played at I Open Praiascacchi in 2007 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E77). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Giovanni De Rasis games or Francesco De Marco games? This Giovanni De Rasis vs Francesco De Marco encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Giovanni De Rasis vs Francesco De Marco?
Giovanni De Rasis vs Francesco De Marco (2007) finished 0–1, a win for Francesco De Marco.
What opening was played in Giovanni De Rasis vs Francesco De Marco?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E77).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Giovanni De Rasis vs Francesco De Marco, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.