Mitzi Vedan De Ramos vs Roger Amorin Vieira
91. ch-BRA 2025, 2025 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mitzi Vedan De Ramos vs Roger Amorin Vieira with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mitzi Vedan De Ramos (1889)
- Black
- Roger Amorin Vieira (1663)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 91. ch-BRA 2025
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mitzi Vedan De Ramos (1889) and Roger Amorin Vieira (1663) was played at 91. ch-BRA 2025 in 2025 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mitzi Vedan De Ramos games or Roger Amorin Vieira games? This Mitzi Vedan De Ramos vs Roger Amorin Vieira encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mitzi Vedan De Ramos vs Roger Amorin Vieira?
Mitzi Vedan De Ramos vs Roger Amorin Vieira (2025) finished 1–0, a win for Mitzi Vedan De Ramos.
What opening was played in Mitzi Vedan De Ramos vs Roger Amorin Vieira?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (ECO B22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mitzi Vedan De Ramos vs Roger Amorin Vieira, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.