Luciano Alves De Paula vs Evandro Amorim Barbosa
2010 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luciano Alves De Paula vs Evandro Amorim Barbosa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luciano Alves De Paula (1704)
- Black
- Evandro Amorim Barbosa (2382)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luciano Alves De Paula (1704) and Evandro Amorim Barbosa (2382) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luciano Alves De Paula games or Evandro Amorim Barbosa games? This Luciano Alves De Paula vs Evandro Amorim Barbosa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luciano Alves De Paula vs Evandro Amorim Barbosa?
Luciano Alves De Paula vs Evandro Amorim Barbosa (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Evandro Amorim Barbosa.
What opening was played in Luciano Alves De Paula vs Evandro Amorim Barbosa?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luciano Alves De Paula vs Evandro Amorim Barbosa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.