Mariano De Pablos Fernandez vs Mikel Gastesi Urroz
2016 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack (D03).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mariano De Pablos Fernandez vs Mikel Gastesi Urroz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mariano De Pablos Fernandez (1927)
- Black
- Mikel Gastesi Urroz (1725)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack (D03)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mariano De Pablos Fernandez (1927) and Mikel Gastesi Urroz (1725) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack (D03). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mariano De Pablos Fernandez games or Mikel Gastesi Urroz games? This Mariano De Pablos Fernandez vs Mikel Gastesi Urroz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mariano De Pablos Fernandez vs Mikel Gastesi Urroz?
Mariano De Pablos Fernandez vs Mikel Gastesi Urroz (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Mariano De Pablos Fernandez.
What opening was played in Mariano De Pablos Fernandez vs Mikel Gastesi Urroz?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack (ECO D03).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mariano De Pablos Fernandez vs Mikel Gastesi Urroz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.