Yasmin Soares De Medeiros vs Werber Cesar Bezerra
2019 · Result ½–½ · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Yasmin Soares De Medeiros vs Werber Cesar Bezerra with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Yasmin Soares De Medeiros (1603)
- Black
- Werber Cesar Bezerra (1797)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Yasmin Soares De Medeiros (1603) and Werber Cesar Bezerra (1797) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Yasmin Soares De Medeiros games or Werber Cesar Bezerra games? This Yasmin Soares De Medeiros vs Werber Cesar Bezerra encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Yasmin Soares De Medeiros vs Werber Cesar Bezerra?
Yasmin Soares De Medeiros vs Werber Cesar Bezerra (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Yasmin Soares De Medeiros vs Werber Cesar Bezerra?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (ECO C48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Yasmin Soares De Medeiros vs Werber Cesar Bezerra, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.