Jennibet De Los Santos vs Jemmily Ramirez Vergara
2018 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jennibet De Los Santos vs Jemmily Ramirez Vergara with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jennibet De Los Santos (1925)
- Black
- Jemmily Ramirez Vergara (1762)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jennibet De Los Santos (1925) and Jemmily Ramirez Vergara (1762) was played in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jennibet De Los Santos games or Jemmily Ramirez Vergara games? This Jennibet De Los Santos vs Jemmily Ramirez Vergara encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jennibet De Los Santos vs Jemmily Ramirez Vergara?
Jennibet De Los Santos vs Jemmily Ramirez Vergara (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Jennibet De Los Santos.
What opening was played in Jennibet De Los Santos vs Jemmily Ramirez Vergara?
The game opened with the French Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO C01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jennibet De Los Santos vs Jemmily Ramirez Vergara, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.