Ramiro De Los Rios vs Mario Santivanez Montes
Lima Open, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ramiro De Los Rios vs Mario Santivanez Montes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ramiro De Los Rios
- Black
- Mario Santivanez Montes (2255)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Lima Open
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ramiro De Los Rios and Mario Santivanez Montes (2255) was played at Lima Open and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ramiro De Los Rios games or Mario Santivanez Montes games? This Ramiro De Los Rios vs Mario Santivanez Montes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ramiro De Los Rios vs Mario Santivanez Montes?
Ramiro De Los Rios vs Mario Santivanez Montes finished 0–1, a win for Mario Santivanez Montes.
What opening was played in Ramiro De Los Rios vs Mario Santivanez Montes?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (ECO B80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ramiro De Los Rios vs Mario Santivanez Montes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.