Frank De La Paz Perdomo vs Roman Hernandez Onna
43. Capablanca Memorial Open, 2008 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Frank De La Paz Perdomo vs Roman Hernandez Onna with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Frank De La Paz Perdomo (2483)
- Black
- Roman Hernandez Onna (2349)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 43. Capablanca Memorial Open
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Frank De La Paz Perdomo (2483) and Roman Hernandez Onna (2349) was played at 43. Capablanca Memorial Open in 2008 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Frank De La Paz Perdomo games or Roman Hernandez Onna games? This Frank De La Paz Perdomo vs Roman Hernandez Onna encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Frank De La Paz Perdomo vs Roman Hernandez Onna?
Frank De La Paz Perdomo vs Roman Hernandez Onna (2008) finished 0–1, a win for Roman Hernandez Onna.
What opening was played in Frank De La Paz Perdomo vs Roman Hernandez Onna?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (ECO C55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Frank De La Paz Perdomo vs Roman Hernandez Onna, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.