Jose Renato Silva De Freitas vs Vivian Heinrichs
2017 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation (E46).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Renato Silva De Freitas vs Vivian Heinrichs with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jose Renato Silva De Freitas (1959)
- Black
- Vivian Heinrichs (2026)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation (E46)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Renato Silva De Freitas (1959) and Vivian Heinrichs (2026) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation (E46). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Renato Silva De Freitas games or Vivian Heinrichs games? This Jose Renato Silva De Freitas vs Vivian Heinrichs encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Renato Silva De Freitas vs Vivian Heinrichs?
Jose Renato Silva De Freitas vs Vivian Heinrichs (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jose Renato Silva De Freitas vs Vivian Heinrichs?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation (ECO E46).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Renato Silva De Freitas vs Vivian Heinrichs, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.