Roger D De Coverly vs Wolfgang Jekel
London Classic Open 2018, 2018 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roger D De Coverly vs Wolfgang Jekel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roger D De Coverly (1951)
- Black
- Wolfgang Jekel (1723)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- London Classic Open 2018
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roger D De Coverly (1951) and Wolfgang Jekel (1723) was played at London Classic Open 2018 in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roger D De Coverly games or Wolfgang Jekel games? This Roger D De Coverly vs Wolfgang Jekel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roger D De Coverly vs Wolfgang Jekel?
Roger D De Coverly vs Wolfgang Jekel (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Roger D De Coverly.
What opening was played in Roger D De Coverly vs Wolfgang Jekel?
The game opened with the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (ECO A11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roger D De Coverly vs Wolfgang Jekel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.