Vinicius Fonseca El De Carvalho vs Daniel Yoshito Ikejiri
2013 · Result ½–½ · Scandinavian Defense (B01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vinicius Fonseca El De Carvalho vs Daniel Yoshito Ikejiri with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vinicius Fonseca El De Carvalho (1691)
- Black
- Daniel Yoshito Ikejiri (1872)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Scandinavian Defense (B01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vinicius Fonseca El De Carvalho (1691) and Daniel Yoshito Ikejiri (1872) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Scandinavian Defense (B01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vinicius Fonseca El De Carvalho games or Daniel Yoshito Ikejiri games? This Vinicius Fonseca El De Carvalho vs Daniel Yoshito Ikejiri encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Scandinavian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vinicius Fonseca El De Carvalho vs Daniel Yoshito Ikejiri?
Vinicius Fonseca El De Carvalho vs Daniel Yoshito Ikejiri (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Vinicius Fonseca El De Carvalho vs Daniel Yoshito Ikejiri?
The game opened with the Scandinavian Defense (ECO B01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vinicius Fonseca El De Carvalho vs Daniel Yoshito Ikejiri, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.