Francisco Jose De Andres Trelles vs Miguel Angel Arias Soto
1982 · Result 1–0 · King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Jose De Andres Trelles vs Miguel Angel Arias Soto with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 1982
- Opening
- King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Jose De Andres Trelles and Miguel Angel Arias Soto was played in 1982 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Jose De Andres Trelles games or Miguel Angel Arias Soto games? This Francisco Jose De Andres Trelles vs Miguel Angel Arias Soto encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Jose De Andres Trelles vs Miguel Angel Arias Soto?
Francisco Jose De Andres Trelles vs Miguel Angel Arias Soto (1982) finished 1–0, a win for Francisco Jose De Andres Trelles.
What opening was played in Francisco Jose De Andres Trelles vs Miguel Angel Arias Soto?
The game opened with the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (ECO B07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Jose De Andres Trelles vs Miguel Angel Arias Soto, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.