Fernando De Andres Gonalons vs Jonathan Edwards
Hastings Masters 2011-12, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Indian Defense (E12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fernando De Andres Gonalons vs Jonathan Edwards with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fernando De Andres Gonalons (2091)
- Black
- Jonathan Edwards
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Hastings Masters 2011-12
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense (E12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fernando De Andres Gonalons (2091) and Jonathan Edwards was played at Hastings Masters 2011-12 in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense (E12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fernando De Andres Gonalons games or Jonathan Edwards games? This Fernando De Andres Gonalons vs Jonathan Edwards encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fernando De Andres Gonalons vs Jonathan Edwards?
Fernando De Andres Gonalons vs Jonathan Edwards (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Fernando De Andres Gonalons.
What opening was played in Fernando De Andres Gonalons vs Jonathan Edwards?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense (ECO E12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fernando De Andres Gonalons vs Jonathan Edwards, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.